NPP accuses NDC of targeting party office in Ho demolition row

A political row has erupted in Ghana's Volta Region after the demolition of part of the fence wall surrounding the New Patriotic Party's regional headquarters in Ho. The NPP has accused the ruling National Democratic Congress of deliberately destroying party structures under the guise of infrastructure development, whilst the NDC insists the action was a legitimate part of its road expansion programme.

The disputed demolition affected the NPP Regional Office, situated near Ho Sports Stadium. The party's Ho Central Constituency Communications Officer, James Geh, told journalists that the incident raised serious questions about how government development projects were being implemented. He pointed out that this was not the first time NPP property had been targeted, referencing an earlier dispute involving the party's constituency office in the same area.

Geh stressed that the NPP supports development initiatives but believes the selective demolition of party structures suggests political motivation. He noted that if the NPP returns to government, it would pursue its own major infrastructure projects, including a proposed dual-carriage road extending from Noguera Junction through the Ho Technical University area.

Government defends infrastructure work

The NDC administration has denied allegations of partisan action. Sorkpa Kafui Agbleze, the Volta Regional Communications Officer, explained that the demolition was part of a routine clearing operation to remove structures within a designated road reservation. He stated that the NPP office fence had been identified and marked for removal as far back as the previous year, and that the Ho Municipal Assembly had communicated this to the party in advance.

Agbleze noted that the demolition was connected to broader road construction and opening works under the government's Big Push infrastructure programme. To support the claim that this was not political targeting, he pointed out that other properties were similarly affected, including portions of an AME Zion Church property and several private buildings, all of which fell within the road corridor.

Why it matters for Ghana

This dispute reflects broader tensions between Ghana's two major political parties ahead of elections and highlights recurring concerns about the treatment of opposition party assets. In Ghana's competitive political environment, accusations of governmental abuse of power—whether substantiated or not—can fuel public debate about institutional independence and fairness.

The incident also underscores the challenges Ghana faces in balancing development imperatives with property rights and political pluralism. When infrastructure projects affect political party offices or private property, the manner in which they are implemented becomes scrutinised for signs of bias. Clear communication, advance notice, and transparent processes are essential to prevent such conflicts from becoming politicised.

For ordinary Ghanaians in Ho and surrounding areas, the real question is whether the road expansion work will improve transportation infrastructure as promised. Both parties have cited development plans in the region, suggesting that infrastructure development remains a key electoral issue. The credibility of government institutions may ultimately depend on how consistently and fairly such policies are applied across all constituencies and political actors.